WATCH Press Release: Comment on ‘The Critical Decade’, Australian Climate Commission Report

14 05 2012

THE CRITICAL DECADE: New South Wales Climate Impacts and Opportunities

Report by the Australian Climate Commission

 Download full report here.

WATCH response to above report, compiled by Lizette Salmon.

 - – -

The impacts of climate change described in the Climate Commission report did not come as a surprise to WATCH spokesperson, Lizette Salmon.

“This report, like many that have preceded it, makes it clear that much of NSW, including, by implication, the Border region, will be vulnerable to increasing climate variability and increasing intensity of extreme weather events, such as severe droughts and occasional flooding rains, crop and livestock losses, more destructive bush fires, more severe heat waves, flourishing of invasive plants and pests and adverse impacts on human health. This is not the sort of future we want for ourselves or our children. We need to change it and we can change it”, said Ms Salmon.

WATCH supports the opportunities and actions and outlined in the Report, including the need for more public transport and to move beyond coal.

“Too much money is being spent on roads and not enough on rail. This report emphasises the need for much more investment in low pollution public transport,” said Ms Salmon.

The Report reveals that “A train line can move 50,000 commuters per hour, whereas a freeway lane can only move 2,500 in the same time.” Despite this, research by the Australian Conservation Foundation shows that NSW has been spending twice as much on roads as on rail. “Given that rail is 20 times more efficient in moving people around, and has less than a quarter the pollution, it’s time governments got serious about improving rail infrastructure”, said Ms Salmon.

WATCH is also very supportive of the Report’s plan for more renewable energy. “Here in Australia coal mining is a fast growing source of greenhouse pollution, while the Asian economic power houses are busy making plans to transition to renewable energy. Japan installed 1,000MW of solar photovoltaics in 2011 and is introducing a feed-in tariff for renewable energy that starts in a couple of months, while China has targets to build a massive 210GW of solar and wind by 2020. Yet NSW is planning to double coal exports from Newcastle, and build the equivalent of 15 new mega mines in the Upper Hunter and Liverpool Plains. This is so counter-intuitive to climate action it’s ridiculous”, said Ms Salmon.

“Currently only 6% of electricity produced in NSW is from renewable sources, even though the NSW government has a target of increasing this to 20% by 2020. Why isn’t the Government working harder to achieve this target? WATCH recently conducted a second large survey of local residents, and found that support for renewable energy remains very high. Border residents want more renewable energy and they want the government to build large scale renewable energy; actions that are consistent with the recommendations in the Climate Commission report.”

“The opportunities for regional Australia to capitalise on renewable energy are enormous.  Regional areas such as Albury Wodonga have a massive solar resource which has barely been tapped yet.  Developing these resources means jobs for Australians, stable electricity prices and a more stable climatic future.”

“The NSW Government has been playing cheap politics over the carbon price, Australia’s first serious attempt at reducing greenhouse pollution. Instead of pandering to the interests of the mining industry, which are clearly not in the national interest, they should be showing leadership, be part of a global effort to avoid the future shown to us in the Climate Commission’s report, and put people and communities ahead of mining executives.”

 - – -

For more comments on the potential for solar energy in our region, see also:

http://www.bordermail.com.au/news/local/news/general/solar-plant-pie-in-sky-says-sophie/2475691.aspx





Event Review: ‘Let’s Build Big Solar’ Campaign Launch

3 03 2012

The morning of Friday 2 March saw a small but hardy bunch of renewables enthusiasts congregate on the outskirts of Wodonga to launch the ‘Let’s Build Big Solar’ campaign. Plans had included sunscreen as well as gumboots.  Luckily the weather was kind and it was at least dry if a bit windy.

The launch location was a large block of land behind the Wodonga Salesyards in Bandiana which had been identified by the North East Greenhouse Alliance as a potential site for a large solar thermal power station. Indeed with its existing power substation (i.e. existing transmission line infrastructure) and flat, open land it appeared an ideal site.

The purpose of the national Let’s Build Big Solar campaign is to rally community support for medium to large scale solar energy plants and to encourage the Federal Government to provide funding for such plants through its $10 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation. This month will see many other grassroots Climate Action Groups from around the country conduct similar launches in their local areas.

After viewing the site, posing for photos and speaking to reporters from the Border Mail and Newsweekly, attendees of the Albury-Wodonga launch were treated to a stimulating presentation by the Managing Director of PSE Communication and Electrical, Paul Shelley. Paul and his wife visited Spain recently and attended guided tours of the three solar thermal power stations (Gemsolar, Valle 1 and Valle 2). Spain has undergone an incredible transformation, moving from being a net importer of electricity to a net exporter, thanks to the construction of countless acres of photovoltaic arrays and wind turbines as well as the solar thermal power stations. For a country with less solar intensity than Australia it is clear they are streets ahead of us. The Australian Government needs to get its act together and make good its commitment to large scale renewables.

In the next couple of months, WATCH members, together with people from many other Climate Action Groups around Australia, will be conducting thousands of community surveys to gauge community attitudes to big solar and then present the findings to Parliament. If you would like to participate in one of these brief (less than 5 minutes) surveys or are able to assist with conducting some surveys, please contact Lauriston Muirhead on 0419633297.

For more information on the Let’s Build Big Solar campaign visit: www.100percent.org.au/bigsolar

Further information on the Spanish Gemsolar power station is available at: www.torresolenergy.com/TORRESOL/gemasolar-plant/en

***The Let’s Build Big Solar launch was covered in the local media





Media analysis in the leadup to COP-17 in Durban, South Africa

28 11 2011

The seventeenth annual meeting of the council of parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change begins today in Durban, South Africa, where the international community will continue negotiations to strengthen the global greenhouse gas mitigation regime.

You can follow the progress of the COP-17 via the official website.

Here is analysis from several different media outlets and think-tanks on the prospects for the talks…

-

SBS World News Australia

Durban – Quick guide to the climate summit

-

Peter Christoff

The Conversation

And what if nothing happens at Durban?

-

The Climate Institute

Policy Briefing: Durban Climate Summit

-

Giles Parkinson

The Climate Spectator

Durban talks off to a bad start

-

The Guardian

Durban Climate Change Conference 2011 (news portal)

-

Simon Retallack

The Huffington Post

Durban Climate Conference: The Only Way is (Bottom) Up

_________________________________________________________________________





WATCH in the Media: David MacIlwain – ‘Carbon tax is the way forward’

7 08 2011

WATCH member David MacIlwain had the following letter published in the Border Mail, 26th July 2011…

“When Julia Gillard declared six days before the last election that “there will be no carbon tax” our hearts sank. This had been the last chance for urgently needed action to reduce Australia’s carbon emissions.

For years under Howard nothing had been done, even to hold steady our emissions.

In 2007 there was much concern and Australia voted for Kevin Rudd partly for his commitment to act on “the great moral challenge of the generation”.

Sadly indeed this was a challenge he was unable to rise to and the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme his government created would actually have assured Australia’s ongoing status as global climate action pariah and shelter for the world’s dig and burn billionaires.

The Greens, who manage to preserve a modicum of independence from the rich and powerful, as well as some disdain for their treatment of our only home, couldn’t vote for the scheme even though they were desperate to “put a price on carbon”.

After political difficulties over the Emissions Trading Scheme, the Greens began advocating a Carbon Tax, ironically an alternative previously favoured by Tony Abbott.

When Julia Gillard had the chance to save the country from the COALition by joining with the Greens, her only option was to adopt this carbon tax, and break her earlier promise.

At least there was now a chance of joining other nations benefiting from expanding renewable energy supplies and cooperative action.”

See original article here on the Border Mail website.





The Conservative Case for Strong Action on Climate Change

4 08 2011

The following is a link to a public lecture at Melbourne University earlier this year given by John Gummer, Lord Deben, entitled Climate Change Action and Conservative Politics.  Lord Deben’s argues that conservatives should back strong action to combat climate change because that is the most likely way of maintaining our society in its present shape, given the overwhelming and disturbing scientific evidence about the likely impact of climate change.

Lord Deben was one of the longest serving Conservative Party politicians in the UK and is now president of an international NGO uniting parliamentarians worldwide to advocate for strong climate ambition.  After 35 years as a Conservative Party MP, John Gummer retired at the 2010 general election.  In 1989, Gummer joined the cabinet under Margaret Thatcher as Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, moving to become Secretary of State for the Environment under John Major in 1993.  He remains the longest serving Secretary of State for the Environment the UK has ever had.  In June 2010, following his retirement as an MP, John Gummer was awarded a peerage and the title of Lord Deben.

-

Download Video: Lord Deben – ‘Climate Change Action & Conservative Politics

-

Date:  24th March 2011, 5.30pm
Location: Elisabeth Murdoch Lecture Theatre, Melbourne University.





WATCH in the Media: ‘Time to stop carbon whinge’

21 07 2011

WATCH member Karen Bowley wrote in a letter to the editor at the Border Mail (21st July 2011)…

” The carbon tax has not yet been passed and already everyone is blaming it for everything.

Most who work in this wealthy country don’t think twice about buying a cup of coffee or a bottle of beer or wine.

And yet the sky is now falling in because the most wealthy of us may be worse off under a carbon tax — David Jones is even blaming the carbon tax on the fact that its profit is down.

We have become so selfish and obsessed by material possessions that we have forgotten that if we do not do something about carbon emissions we may not have a world worth living in.

Whether you live near the sea or inland, we are all feeling the effects of climate change with climate extremes becoming the norm.

While the carbon tax may require tweeking, this government is trying to do something for the good of the country, the planet and the future of our children.

Congratulations to the Jones Street Butchery (The Border Mail, 14 June) which has taken up the challenge and is changing its business to minimise emissions.

I hope the carbon tax will eventually make all businesses — especially those 500 biggest polluters — do the same.

This is the challenge of the 21st century.”

KAREN BOWLEY, Wodonga.

-

Download the original article at the Border Mail website.





WATCH in the Media: David Macilwain – ‘Long Conversations’ Climate Knowledge Exchange in Beechworth

13 07 2011

Event: Beechworth Community Visions – ‘Long Conversations: Climate Knowledge Exchange’.

Date: Tuesday 31st May, 2011.

Location: The Gallery, Beechworth Secondary College.

Local Sponsors: Beechworth Urban Landcare & Sustainability and Beechworth Secondary College.

-

WATCH member David MacIlwain attended this event and shares his thoughts in this video interview and in his written review below.

-

See David MacIlwain’s review of the event at Our Voice: Politics Albury-Wodonga.

Original posting at the Long Conversations website.

-

Further Information:

The Long Conversations: Climate Knowledge Exchange hopes to achieve a range of outcomes, including:

  1. Community outcomes, including discussion of our shared climate future, and greater engagement with climate research and researchers and scientists in general.
  2. Outcomes for scientists and academics, including generating greater understanding of your community’s needs and concerns.
  3. Creation of a documentary film and photographic record based on the events and content of the project. We aim to document people’s past and present experiences, stories of climate, and vision for the future.
  4. Research outcomes including publication in scholarly journals and PhD thesis.

Long Conversations hopes to make leading climate science and climate scientists more accessible, and to engage with the community’s goals and climate knowledge, with the aim of working together to build a shared climate future.





Media Release: WATCH Position Statement on the Government’s ‘Clean Energy Future’ policy announcement

10 07 2011

Sunday 10th July, 2011

 -

Our Position

WATCH offers its qualified support to the government’s Clean Energy Future proposal.  We believe it provides a foundation for strong emissions reduction measures, consistent with the scientific evidence.

WATCH holds the following assumptions as the basis for our position…

  • The Earth is a finite system which has a limited capacity to supply resources to and absorb wastes from human activity.  On the basis of compelling scientific evidence, we believe these limits have been reached, particularly with regard to human-induced greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
  • This overwhelming scientific evidence demands timely, strong greenhouse gas mitigation measures.
  • We believe that because climate change is a global problem impacting all human societies, every person on the planet has a responsibility to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, both individually and in the collectives in which they are members (country; workplace; social organisations; family).  This responsibility is innate, regardless of what others are doing.
  • Time is of the essence.  Because of the increasing frequency and magnitude of climate-related impacts, in line with the upper end of IPCC prediction ranges, we cannot afford to waste further time debating the merits of different methods of carbon abatement without taking concrete action.
  • Authoritative studies have demonstrated that the costs of carbon abatement and adaptation to climate-related damages will increase dramatically over time.  Therefore, we favour strong policy action now as the cheapest method of addressing the climate change threat.
  • We believe in the necessity of a carbon price as an appropriate market-driven mechanism to drive economy-wide greenhouse gas emission reductions, to the level mandated by the scientific evidence, in combination with complimentary government policy interventions.

We also hope that today’s policy announcement will lift the tone of the public debate on climate change policy and move Australia away from the redundant debate about the reality of climate change to focus on how we, as individuals, families, communities and as a nation are going to respond to it.

-

The Positives…

We see many positive aspects of the Clean Energy Future proposal, including the following:

  • Greenhouse gas pollution will be internalised in the cost of business for polluting companies.
  • The certainty for business and investment planning provided by the $23/tonne carbon price during the first three years of the carbon tax and the $15/tonne price floor for the carbon price when it transitions to an emissions trading scheme in 2015.
  • The target of 80% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2050, in line with the recommendations of key scientific bodies.
  • The independent Climate Change Authority to monitor Australia’s carbon pollution levels make authoritative, science-based policy recommendations.
  • The $10 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation to drive investment in the renewable energy sector and facilitate Australia’s transition away from fossil fuel-based energy.
  • No new coal-fired power stations and the buy-out of 2,000 MW of coal-fired power generation from the present grid.
  • The Carbon Farming Initiative, providing that thorough carbon accounting practices are adopted.
  • The household compensation package, given that low income households are most exposed to the costs of both greenhouse gas mitigation and climate change adaptation.

-

Our Concerns…

We also have a number of concerns about the policy that we would like the government to address:

  • That the generous compensation offered to polluting sectors of the economy may distort the intended market signal of the carbon price and thus reduce its effectiveness as a mechanism for emissions abatement.
  • That the reduction in the number of companies to be included under the carbon tax may reduce the incentive for economy-wide, rather than limited sectoral efficiency gains and emissions reductions.
  • That the scheme will forgo an important revenue source in the sale of emissions permits by giving away 94.5% of them to polluting industries, rather than having these companies buy them at the market rate.
  • That the government will repeat the mistake made by the European Union’s emissions trading scheme by setting a weak emissions cap and giving away too many emissions permits.
  • That the Clean Energy Future proposal relies too heavily on the purchase of carbon offsets from overseas, rather than concentrate more heavily on reducing emissions at their source here in Australia.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Related Links:

Clean Energy Future official website.

ABC News: Climate Change – Pricing Carbon website.

Key climate change related documents.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.